Science of Science

Quantitative understanding of the interactions among scientific agents

By J.A. Torres-Matallana

June 26, 2023

“The science of science (SciSci) offers a quantitative understanding of the interactions among scientific agents across diverse geographic and temporal scales: It provides insights into the conditions underlying creativity and the genesis of scientific discovery, with the ultimate goal of developing tools and policies that have the potential to accelerate science.” (Fortunato et al., 2018).

A bibliometric analysis on Science of Science.

Web of Science (WoS) is a key “website which provides subscription-based access to multiple databases that provide comprehensive citation data for many different academic disciplines originally produced by the Institute for Scientific Information and is currently maintained by Clarivate Analytics." (Wikipedia, 2020). SCOPUS is the second source of bibliographic references consulted. “Scopus uniquely combines a comprehensive, expertly curated abstract and citation database with enriched data and linked scholarly literature across a wide variety of disciplines." ( scopus).

A search including in all fields for the WoS database and title, abstract and keywords for the SCOPUS database, was performed with the search keywords:

  • “science of science”

The search was made on 26th June 2023. A total of 580 documents of scientific references was retrieved, from which a full reference plus citations per document was retrieved as a bibtex database file. The references were analyzed by using the bibliometrix R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis ( Aria and Cuccurullo 2017). In this document is presented a summary of this bibliometric analysis, which can be used as a potential starting point for future research.

“The value proposition of SciSci is that with a deeper understanding of the factors that drive successful science, we can more effectively address environmental, societal, and technological problems.” (Fortunato et al., 2018).

Table 1 shows the main information for the documents retrieved and analyzed.

Table 1. Main information summary for the documents retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus searches.
Description Results
MAIN INFORMATION ABOUT DATA
Timespan 1939:2023
Sources (Journals, Books, etc) 359
Documents 580
Annual Growth Rate Document Average Age 9.85
Average citations per doc 13.85
Average citations per year per doc 2.033
References 13062
DOCUMENT TYPES
article 363
a rticle article 2
article review 1
article; early access 3
article; proceedings paper 7
biographical-item 3
book 6
book chapter 27
book review 16
conference paper 26
conference review 2
data paper 1
editorial 5
editorial material 18
erratum 3
letter 6
meeting abstract 1
news item 1
note 6
proceedings paper 46
retracted 1
review 33
review; early access 2
short survey article 1
DOCUMENT CONTENTS
Keywords Plus (ID) 1143
Author’s Keywords (DE) 1427
AUTHORS
Authors 1142
Author Appearances 1555
Authors of single-authored docs 193
AUTHORS COLLABORATION
Single-authored docs 234
Documents per Author 0.508
Co-Authors per Doc 2.68
International co-authorships % 17.76

Figure 1.1. Annual production in terms of documents published.

Figure 1.2. Most productive countries in terms of documents published.

Figure 1.3. shows the network of country collaboration.

Figure 1.3. Country collaboration network in terms of documents published.

Table 2 shows the most productive authors.

Table 2. Most productive authors for the documents retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus searches.
Authors Articles
WANG Y 13
XIA F 13
KOKOWSKI M 12
(Anonymous) 11
OSBORNE F 11
MOTTA E 10
LIU J 9
WANG D 9
PETERSEN AM 8
BU Y 7
LEE I 7
SALATINO A 7
SHAO Z 7
YUAN S 7
BOERNER K 6
KONG X 6
SCHEUFELE DA 6
ZHANG Y 6
DONG Y 5
EVANS JA 5

Table 3 shows the most cited papers.

Table 3. Most cited papers from the Web of Science and Scopus searches. TC = total citations.
Paper Reference DOI TC TCPerYear
FORTUNATO S, 2018, SCIENCE ( Fortunato et al. 2018) 10.1126/science.aao0185 506 84.33
KAHAN DM, 2015, POLIT PSYCHOL ( Kahan 2015) 10.1111/pops.12244 313 34.78
HUANG J, 2020, PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A ( J. Huang et al. 2020) 10.1073/pnas.1914221117 308 77.00
BETTENCOURT LMA, 2011, PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A ( Bettencourt and Kaur 2011) 10.1073/pnas.1102712108 244 18.77
GARFIELD E, 2009, J INFORMETR ( Garfield 2009) 10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.009 227 15.13
FISCHHOFF B, 2013, PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A ( Fischhoff 2013) 10.1073/pnas.1213273110 223 20.27
ZENG A, 2017, PHYS REP-REV SEC PHYS LETT ( Zeng et al. 2017) 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.001 184 26.29
PETERSEN AM, 2014, PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A ( Alexander Michael Petersen et al. 2014) 10.1073/pnas.1323111111 147 14.70
WEINBERG BH, 1974, INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL ( B. H. Weinberg 1974) 10.1016/0020-0271(74)90058-8 136 2.72
BIBRIA SE, 2017, SUST CITIES SOC ( Bibria and Krogstie 2017) 10.1016/j.scs.2016.11.004 118 16.86
STEVENS SS, 1939, PSYCHOL BULL ( Stevens 1939) 10.1037/h0056886 113 1.33
STOKNES PE, 2014, ENERGY RES SOC SCI ( Stoknes 2014) 10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.007 110 11.00
SUN X, 2013, SCI REP ( Sun et al. 2013) 10.1038/srep01069 110 10.00
CLAUSET A, 2017, SCIENCE ( Clauset, Larremore, and Sinatra 2017) 10.1126/science.aal4217 104 14.86
PETERSEN AM, 2012, PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A ( Alexander M. Petersen et al. 2012) 10.1073/pnas.1121429109 104 8.67
RZHETSKY A, 2015, PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A ( Rzhetsky et al. 2015) 10.1073/pnas.1509757112 101 11.22
LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, J INFORMETR ( Leydesdorff and Wagner 2009) 10.1016/j.joi.2009.05.005 97 6.47
KAHAN DM, 2013, SCIENCE ( Wagner et al. 2018) 10.1126/science.1245724 96 8.73
LETCHFORD A, 2015, R SOC OPEN SCI ( Letchford, Moat, and Preis 2015) 10.1098/rsos.150266 89 9.89
SAKS MJ, 2003, SCI JUSTICE ( Saks et al. 2003) 10.1016/S1355-0306(03)71747-X 88 4.19

Table 4 shows the most sources of the documents retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus searches.

Table 4. Most relevant sources of the documents retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus searches.
Sources Articles
SCIENTOMETRICS 42
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 30
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 25
STUDIA HISTORIAE SCIENTIARUM 11
EPJ DATA SCIENCE 7
IEEE ACCESS 7
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES 7
THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 7
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 6
VOPROSY FILOSOFII 6
ISSI 2017 - 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 5
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 5
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY 5
DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE 4
NUTRITION TODAY 4
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS 4
SCIENCE 4
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 4
2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA) 3
ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDING SERIES 3

Author keyword co-occurrences

Figure 2 illustrates the author keyword co-occurrences network.

Figure 2. Web of Science and Scopus author keyword co-ocurrences. Cluster 1 in red, and Cluster 2 in blue.

Table 5 shows the most relevant references by clusters defined in the bibliometric analysis by author keyword.

Table 5. Most relevant references by clusters defined in the bibliometric analysis by author keyword. TC = Times Cited; PY = Publication Year. The index 1 stands for the more recent publications.
Cluster Keyword Reference TC PY Reference.1 TC.1 PY.1
1 BIBLIOMETRICS ( Garfield 2009) 227 2009 ( Y. Huang, Tian, and Ma 2023) 0 2023
1 BIBLIOMETRICS ( Rose and Kitchin 2019) 61 2019 ( Viswalekshmi, Bendi, and Opoku 2023) 0 2023
1 BIBLIOMETRICS ( Kozlowski et al. 2022) 47 2022 ( Shekhar and Valeri 2023) 1 2023
1 BIBLIOMETRICS ( M.-H. Wang, Ho, and Fu 2019) 36 2019 ( Acuna et al. 2022a) 0 2022
1 CITATION ANALYSIS ( Letchford, Moat, and Preis 2015) 89 2015 ( Miura, Asatani, and Sakata 2023) 0 2023
1 CITATION ANALYSIS ( Schulz et al. 2014) 49 2014 ( Juan Liu et al. 2021) 20 2022
1 CITATION ANALYSIS ( Letchford, Preis, and Moat 2016) 26 2016 ( Fairclough and Thelwall 2022b) 4 2022
1 CITATION ANALYSIS ( Juan Liu et al. 2021) 20 2022 ( Smalheiser et al. 2022) 2 2022
1 COLLABORATION ( Milojevic 2015) 42 2015 ( F. Liu, Rahwan, and AlShebli 2023a) 0 2023
1 COLLABORATION ( Cimini, Zaccaria, and Gabrielli 2016) 30 2016 ( Danus et al. 2023) 0 2023
1 COLLABORATION ( Smith et al. 2021) 12 2021 ( Haghani et al. 2023) 0 2023
1 COLLABORATION ( Yuan et al. 2020) 11 2020 ( Tokmachev 2023) 0 2023
1 HISTORY OF SCIENCE ( Borner and Scharnhorst 2009) 55 2009 ( Fairclough and Thelwall 2022a) 1 2022
1 HISTORY OF SCIENCE ( Lin 1988) 18 2001 ( Benatti, Arruda, Silva, Comin, and Fontoura Costa 2023) 0 2022
1 HISTORY OF SCIENCE ( Poggi et al. 2019a) 5 2019 ( Shaikh, Alhoori, and Sun 2023a) 0 2022
1 HISTORY OF SCIENCE ( Acuna et al. 2022b) 4 2021 ( Acuna et al. 2022b) 4 2021
1 INNOVATION ( Bibria and Krogstie 2017) 118 2017 ( Cheng et al. 2023) 0 2023
1 INNOVATION ( Rzhetsky et al. 2015) 101 2015 ( Shekhar and Valeri 2023) 1 2023
1 INNOVATION ( Adam et al. 2018) 45 2018 ( Suleimenov, Gabrielyan, and Vitulyova 2022) 0 2022
1 INNOVATION ( Blau and Weinberg 2017) 32 2017 ( Beck et al. 2021) 0 2021
1 KNOWLEDGE ( K. Wang et al. 2019) 55 2019 ( Cheng et al. 2023) 0 2023
1 KNOWLEDGE ( Nisbet and Fahy 2015) 52 2015 ( X. Zhao et al. 2023) 0 2023
1 KNOWLEDGE ( Notten, Mairesse, and Verspagen 2017) 41 2017 ( Shekhar and Valeri 2023) 1 2023
1 KNOWLEDGE ( Q. Zhao et al. 2017) 26 2017 ( Angioni, Salatino, Osborne, Recupero, et al. 2022) 1 2022
1 MACHINE LEARNING ( Poggi et al. 2019b) 6 2019 ( Shaikh, Alhoori, and Sun 2023b) 0 2023
1 MACHINE LEARNING ( W. Liu et al. 2019) 5 2019 ( Youyou, Yang, and Uzzi 2023) 4 2023
1 MACHINE LEARNING ( Youyou, Yang, and Uzzi 2023) 4 2023 ( Bickley, Chan, and Torgler 2022) 2 2022
1 MACHINE LEARNING ( L. Li, Wu, and Evans 2020) 3 2020 ( Borrego et al. 2022) 0 2022
1 PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ( Blancke, Boudry, and Pigliucci 2017) 30 2017 ( Reisz et al. 2022) 0 2022
1 PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ( McLevey et al. 2018) 16 2018 ( Shmonin 2022) 1 2022
1 PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ( Poggi et al. 2019a) 5 2019 ( Kuznetsova 2021) 0 2021
1 PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ( Gołębiewska 2020) 3 2019 ( Palchykov et al. 2016a) 1 2020
1 SCHOLARLY DATA ( Zeng et al. 2017) 184 2017 ( X. Zhao et al. 2023) 0 2023
1 SCHOLARLY DATA ( Kong et al. 2019) 70 2019 ( Aggarwal et al. 2022) 1 2022
1 SCHOLARLY DATA ( Boerner et al. 2010) 44 2010 ( Angioni, Salatino, Osborne, Recupero, et al. 2022) 1 2022
1 SCHOLARLY DATA ( Salatino et al. 2019) 30 2019 ( Angioni, Salatino, Osborne, Birukou, et al. 2022) 0 2022
1 SCIENCE OF SCIENCE ( J. Huang et al. 2020) 308 2020 ( Benatti, Arruda, Silva, Comin, and Costa 2023) 1 2023
1 SCIENCE OF SCIENCE ( Bettencourt and Kaur 2011) 244 2011 ( Cheng et al. 2023) 0 2023
1 SCIENCE OF SCIENCE ( Garfield 2009) 227 2009 ( Danus et al. 2023) 0 2023
1 SCIENCE OF SCIENCE ( Zeng et al. 2017) 184 2017 ( Haghani et al. 2023) 0 2023
1 SCIENTOMETRICS ( Garfield 2009) 227 2009 ( Miura, Asatani, and Sakata 2023) 0 2023
1 SCIENTOMETRICS ( Fire and Guestrin 2019) 73 2019 ( Shaikh, Alhoori, and Sun 2023b) 0 2023
1 SCIENTOMETRICS ( Rose and Kitchin 2019) 61 2019 ( Bickley, Chan, and Torgler 2022) 2 2022
1 SCIENTOMETRICS ( Borner and Scharnhorst 2009) 55 2009 ( Cena et al. 2022) 3 2022
1 SCOPUS ( Rose and Kitchin 2019) 61 2019 ( Way et al. 2019) 1 2021
1 SCOPUS ( Poggi et al. 2019a) 5 2019 ( Palchykov et al. 2016a) 1 2020
1 SCOPUS ( Way et al. 2019) 1 2021 ( Poggi et al. 2019a) 5 2019
1 SCOPUS ( Palchykov et al. 2016a) 1 2020 ( Rose and Kitchin 2019) 61 2019
2 OF SCIENCE ( J. Huang et al. 2020) 308 2020 ( Benatti, Arruda, Silva, Comin, and Costa 2023) 1 2023
2 OF SCIENCE ( Bettencourt and Kaur 2011) 244 2011 ( Cheng et al. 2023) 0 2023
2 OF SCIENCE ( Garfield 2009) 227 2009 ( Danus et al. 2023) 0 2023
2 OF SCIENCE ( Zeng et al. 2017) 184 2017 ( Haghani et al. 2023) 0 2023
2 SCIENCE ( Kahan 2015) 313 2015 ( F. Liu, Rahwan, and AlShebli 2023a) 0 2023
2 SCIENCE ( J. Huang et al. 2020) 308 2020 ( Beese et al. 2023) 0 2023
2 SCIENCE ( Bettencourt and Kaur 2011) 244 2011 ( Benatti, Arruda, Silva, Comin, and Costa 2023) 1 2023
2 SCIENCE ( Garfield 2009) 227 2009 ( Cheng et al. 2023) 0 2023
2 SCIENCE OF ( J. Huang et al. 2020) 308 2020 ( Benatti, Arruda, Silva, Comin, and Costa 2023) 1 2023
2 SCIENCE OF ( Bettencourt and Kaur 2011) 244 2011 ( Cheng et al. 2023) 0 2023
2 SCIENCE OF ( Garfield 2009) 227 2009 ( Danus et al. 2023) 0 2023
2 SCIENCE OF ( Zeng et al. 2017) 184 2017 ( Haghani et al. 2023) 0 2023

Subject co-ocurrences

Figure 3 illustrates the WoS and Scopus subject co-occurrences network.

Figure 3. Web of Science and Scopus subject co-ocurrences. Cluster 1 in red, Cluster 2 in blue, Cluster 3 in green, Cluster 4 in purple, and Cluster 5 in orange.

Table 6 shows the most relevant references by clusters defined in the bibliometric analysis by subject.

Table 6. Most relevant references by clusters defined in the bibliometric analysis by Subject. TC = Times Cited; PY = Publication Year. The index 1 stands for the more recent publications.
Cluster Subject Reference TC PY Reference.1 TC.1 PY.1
1 BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS ( B. A. Weinberg 2011) 31 2011 ( Shekhar and Valeri 2023) 1 2023
1 BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS ( Furman, Murray, and Stern 2012) 24 2012 ( Bosco 2022) 0 2022
1 BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS ( J. I. Lane et al. 2015) 20 2015 ( Jones, Manville, and Chataway 2022) 16 2022
1 BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS ( Jones, Manville, and Chataway 2022) 16 2022 ( Kim et al. 2022) 8 2022
1 GOVERNMENT AND LAW ( Kahan 2015) 313 2015 ( Viswanath et al. 2022) 2 2022
1 GOVERNMENT AND LAW ( Nisbet and Fahy 2015) 52 2015 ( Thomas and Thomas 2020) 4 2020
1 GOVERNMENT AND LAW ( Largent and Lane 2012) 18 2012 ( Shchennikova 2016) 0 2016
1 GOVERNMENT AND LAW ( Thomas and Thomas 2020) 4 2020 ( Kahan 2015) 313 2015
1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ( Furman, Murray, and Stern 2012) 24 2012 ( Cuhls et al. 2015) 5 2015
1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ( Largent and Lane 2012) 18 2012 ( Hall, Layson, and Link 2014) 5 2014
1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ( Visvanathan 2002) 11 2002 ( Furman, Murray, and Stern 2012) 24 2012
1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ( Cuhls et al. 2015) 5 2015 ( J. Lane and Black 2012) 4 2012
2 COMMUNICATION ( Jiaying Liu et al. 2018) 75 2018 ( Angioni, Salatino, Osborne, Recupero, et al. 2022) 1 2022
2 COMMUNICATION ( Hendriks, Kienhues, and Bromme 2016) 22 2016 ( Barnidge et al. 2022) 4 2022
2 COMMUNICATION ( Molontay and Nagy 2019) 12 2019 ( Borrego et al. 2022) 0 2022
2 COMMUNICATION ( Shao, Yuan, and Wang 2020) 10 2020 ( Fleerackers 2022) 0 2022
2 EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ( Koponen 2021) 4 2021 ( Howell et al. 2023) 0 2023
2 EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ( Elzinga 2012) 3 2012 ( Koponen 2021) 4 2021
2 EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ( Apolsky et al. 2019) 2 2019 ( Apolsky et al. 2019) 2 2019
2 EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ( THAGARD 1992) 1 1992 ( Zhang et al. 2019) 0 2019
2 HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ( Hendriks, Kienhues, and Bromme 2016) 22 2016 ( Robin 2022) 0 2022
2 HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ( Alexander M. Petersen, Pavlidis, and Semendeferi 2014) 22 2014 ( Scheufele 2022) 2 2022
2 HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ( Hackett and Rhoten 2011) 16 2011 ( Baturin 2020) 0 2020
2 HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ( HAMLIN 1992) 10 1992 ( Gerken 2020) 3 2020
2 PHILOSOPHY ( LAUDAN 1981) 72 1981 ( Contreras Kallens, Hicks, and Jennings 2022) 0 2022
2 PHILOSOPHY ( Blancke, Boudry, and Pigliucci 2017) 30 2017 ( Korzhuev et al. 2022) 0 2022
2 PHILOSOPHY ( Hendriks, Kienhues, and Bromme 2016) 22 2016 ( Robin 2022) 0 2022
2 PHILOSOPHY ( Alexander M. Petersen, Pavlidis, and Semendeferi 2014) 22 2014 ( Scheufele 2022) 2 2022
2 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - OTHER TOPICS ( Fortunato et al. 2018) 506 2018 ( Beese et al. 2023) 0 2023
2 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - OTHER TOPICS ( J. Huang et al. 2020) 308 2020 ( F. Liu, Rahwan, and AlShebli 2023b) 0 2023
2 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - OTHER TOPICS ( Bettencourt and Kaur 2011) 244 2011 ( L. Liu et al. 2023) 0 2023
2 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - OTHER TOPICS ( Fischhoff 2013) 223 2013 ( Youyou, Yang, and Uzzi 2023) 4 2023
2 SOCIAL SCIENCES - OTHER TOPICS ( LAUDAN 1981) 72 1981 ( Fujita and Vitevitch 2022) 1 2022
2 SOCIAL SCIENCES - OTHER TOPICS ( Nisbet and Fahy 2015) 52 2015 ( J. Li et al. 2022) 0 2022
2 SOCIAL SCIENCES - OTHER TOPICS ( Bornmann, Haunschild, and Mutz 2021) 41 2021 ( Viswanath et al. 2022) 2 2022
2 SOCIAL SCIENCES - OTHER TOPICS ( Alexander M. Petersen, Pavlidis, and Semendeferi 2014) 22 2014 ( Bornmann, Haunschild, and Mutz 2021) 41 2021
3 ENGINEERING ( Jiaying Liu et al. 2018) 75 2018 ( Angioni, Salatino, Osborne, Recupero, et al. 2022) 1 2022
3 ENGINEERING ( Alexander M. Petersen, Pavlidis, and Semendeferi 2014) 22 2014 ( Borrego et al. 2022) 0 2022
3 ENGINEERING ( Hackett and Rhoten 2011) 16 2011 ( Jones, Manville, and Chataway 2022) 16 2022
3 ENGINEERING ( Jones, Manville, and Chataway 2022) 16 2022 ( Shao et al. 2022) 7 2022
3 NEUROSCIENCES AND NEUROLOGY ( Dworkin, Shinohara, and Bassett 2018) 8 2018 ( L. Liu et al. 2023) 0 2023
3 NEUROSCIENCES AND NEUROLOGY ( L. Liu et al. 2023) 0 2023 ( Dworkin, Shinohara, and Bassett 2018) 8 2018
3 NEUROSCIENCES AND NEUROLOGY ( Silva, Avina, and Tsao 2016) 0 2016 ( Silva, Avina, and Tsao 2016) 0 2016
3 PSYCHOLOGY ( Kahan 2015) 313 2015 ( L. Liu et al. 2023) 0 2023
3 PSYCHOLOGY ( Blanton and Ikizer 2019) 8 2019 ( Bosco 2022) 0 2022
3 PSYCHOLOGY ( Mannocci, Osborne, and Motta 2019) 7 2019 ( Thelwall 2020) 4 2020
3 PSYCHOLOGY ( Thelwall 2020) 4 2020 ( Blanton and Ikizer 2019) 8 2019
4 COMPUTER SCIENCE ( Garfield 2009) 227 2009 ( Jaramillo, Montes, and Menezes 2023) 0 2023
4 COMPUTER SCIENCE ( Leydesdorff and Wagner 2009) 97 2009 ( Macedo, Jaramillo, and Menezes 2023) 0 2023
4 COMPUTER SCIENCE ( Guo, Weingart, and Boerner 2011) 75 2011 ( Miura, Asatani, and Sakata 2023) 0 2023
4 COMPUTER SCIENCE ( Jiaying Liu et al. 2018) 75 2018 ( Patelli et al. 2023) 1 2023
4 INFORMATION SCIENCE AND LIBRARY SCIENCE ( Garfield 2009) 227 2009 ( Y. Huang, Tian, and Ma 2023) 0 2023
4 INFORMATION SCIENCE AND LIBRARY SCIENCE ( Leydesdorff and Wagner 2009) 97 2009 ( M. Li, Zhang, and Wang 2023) 0 2023
4 INFORMATION SCIENCE AND LIBRARY SCIENCE ( Guo, Weingart, and Boerner 2011) 75 2011 ( Miura, Asatani, and Sakata 2023) 0 2023
4 INFORMATION SCIENCE AND LIBRARY SCIENCE ( Dahlberg 2006) 64 2006 ( Patelli et al. 2023) 1 2023
5 MATHEMATICS ( Schulz et al. 2014) 49 2014 ( Danus et al. 2023) 0 2023
5 MATHEMATICS ( Janosov, Battiston, and Sinatra 2020) 20 2020 ( Servedio et al. 2023) 0 2023
5 MATHEMATICS ( Alexander M. Petersen and Penner 2014) 18 2014 ( Borycz, Horne, and Bentley 2022) 0 2022
5 MATHEMATICS ( Palchykov et al. 2016b) 10 2016 ( Seckin and Varol 2022) 0 2022

Author’s co-citation and coupling

Figure 4 illustrates the author’s co-citation network.

Figure 4. Author’s co-citation network.

Figure 5 illustrates the author’s coupling network.

Figure 5. Author’s coupling network. Cluster 1 in red, Cluster 2 in blue, and Cluster 3 in green.

References

Acuna, Daniel E., Zijun Yi, Lizhen Liang, and Han Zhuang. 2022a. “Predicting the Usage of Scientific Datasets Based on Article, Author, Institution, and Journal Bibliometrics.” Proceedings Paper. In INFORMATION FOR a BETTER WORLD: SHAPING THE GLOBAL FUTURE, PT i, edited by M Smits, 13192:42–52. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND: Univ Coll Dublin; Univ Texas Austin; SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96957-8\_5.

———. 2022b. “Predicting the Usage of Scientific Datasets Based on Article, Author, Institution, and Journal Bibliometrics.” Conference paper. Edited by Smits M. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 13192 LNCS: 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96957-8_5.

Adam, Paula, Pavel V. Ovseiko, Jonathan Grant, Kathryn E. A. Graham, Omar F. Boukhris, Anne-Maree Dowd, Gert V. Balling, et al. 2018. “ISRIA Statement: Ten-Point Guidelines for an Effective Process of Research Impact Assessment.” Article. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0281-5.

Aggarwal, Tanay, Angelo Salatino, Francesco Osborne, and Enrico Motta. 2022. “R-Classify: Extracting Research Papers’ Relevant Concepts from a Controlled Vocabulary.” Article. SOFTWARE IMPACTS 14 (November). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpa.2022.100444.

Angioni, Simone, Angelo Salatino, Francesco Osborne, Aliaksandr Birukou, Diego Reforgiato Recupero, and Enrico Motta. 2022. “Leveraging Knowledge Graph Technologies to Assess Journals and Conferences at Springer Nature.” Proceedings Paper. In SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2022, edited by U Sattler, A Hogan, M Keet, V Presutti, JPA Almeida, H Takeda, P Monnin, G Pirro, and C DAmato, 13489:735–52. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND: ChinaScope; Elsevier; IBM Res; Metaphacts; MEMECT; Oracle; Springer; SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19433-7\_42.

Angioni, Simone, Angelo Salatino, Francesco Osborne, Diego Reforgiato Recupero, and Enrico Motta. 2022. “The AIDA Dashboard: A Web Application for Assessing and Comparing Scientific Conferences.” Article. IEEE ACCESS 10: 39471–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3166256.

Apolsky, Evgeny A., Andrey Yu. Mordovtsev, Alexey Yu. Mamychev, and Tatyana V. Mordovtseva. 2019. “State-Legal Doctrines of Russia as a Scientific Category: Essential Dimension and Law-Free.” Article. DILEMAS CONTEMPORANEOS-EDUCACION POLITICA Y VALORES 7 (1).

Aria, Massimo, and Corrado Cuccurullo. 2017. “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis.” Journal of Informetrics 11 (4): 959–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.

Barnidge, Matthew, Lindsey A. Sherrill, Bumsoo Kim, Eric Cooks, Danielle Deavours, Michael Viehouser, Ryan Broussard, and Jiehua Zhang. 2022. “The Effects of Virtual Reality News on Learning about Climate Change.” Article. MASS COMMUNICATION AND SOCIETY 25 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1925300.

Baturin, Yuri M. 2020. “The Last Interview of Academician Boris e. Paton.” Editorial Material. SOCIOLOGIA NAUKI I TEHNOLOGIJ-SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 11 (4): 191–93. https://doi.org/10.24411/2079-0910-2020-14011.

Beck, Susanne, Marcel LaFlamme, Carsten Bergenholtz, Marcel Bogers, Tiare-Maria Brasseur, Marie-Louise Conradsen, Kevin Crowston, et al. 2021. “Examining Open Innovation in Science (OIS): What Open Innovation Can and Cannot Offer the Science of Science.” Article; Early Access. INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1999248.

Beese, Dominik, Beguem Altunbas, Gorkem Guezeler, and Steffen Eger. 2023. “Did AI Get More Negative Recently?” Article. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221159.

Benatti, Alexandre, Henrique Ferraz de Arruda, Filipi Nascimento Silva, Cesar Henrique Comin, and Luciano da Fontoura Costa. 2023. “On the Stability of Citation Networks.” Article. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS 610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.128399.

Benatti, Alexandre, Henrique Ferraz de Arruda, Filipi Nascimento Silva, César Henrique Comin, and Luciano da Fontoura Costa. 2023. “On the Stability of Citation Networks.” Article. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.128399.

Bettencourt, Luis M. A., and Jasleen Kaur. 2011. “Evolution and Structure of Sustainability Science.” Article. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 108 (49): 19540–45. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108.

Bibria, Simon Elias, and John Krogstie. 2017. “On the Social Shaping Dimensions of Smart Sustainable Cities: A Study in Science, Technology, and Society.” Article. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY 29 (February): 219–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.11.004.

Bickley, Steve J., Ho Fai Chan, and Benno Torgler. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Economics.” Article. SCIENTOMETRICS 127 (4): 2055–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04294-w.

Blancke, Stefaan, Maarten Boudry, and Massimo Pigliucci. 2017. “Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience.” Article. THEORIA-A SWEDISH JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY 83 (1): 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12109.

Blanton, Hart, and Elif G. Ikizer. 2019. “Elegant Science Narratives and Unintended Influences: An Agenda for the Science of Science Communication.” Article. SOCIAL ISSUES AND POLICY REVIEW 13 (1): 154–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12055.

Blau, David M., and Bruce A. Weinberg. 2017. “Why the US Science and Engineering Workforce Is Aging Rapidly.” Article. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 114 (15): 3879–84. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611748114.

Boerner, Katy, Weixia Huang, Micah Linnemeier, Russell J. Duhon, Patrick Phillips, Nianli Ma, Angela M. Zoss, Hanning Guo, and Mark A. Price. 2010. “Rete-Netzwerk-Red: Analyzing and Visualizing Scholarly Networks Using the Network Workbench Tool.” Article. SCIENTOMETRICS 83 (3): 863–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0149-0.

Borner, Katy, and Andrea Scharnhorst. 2009. “Visual Conceptualizations and Models of Science.” Editorial Material. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 3 (3): 161–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.008.

Bornmann, Lutz, Robin Haunschild, and Rudiger Mutz. 2021. “Growth Rates of Modern Science: A Latent Piecewise Growth Curve Approach to Model Publication Numbers from Established and New Literature Databases.” Article. HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00903-w.

Borrego, Agustin, Danilo Dessi, Inma Hernandez, Francesco Osborne, Diego Reforgiato Recupero, David Ruiz, Davide Buscaldi, and Enrico Motta. 2022. “Completing Scientific Facts in Knowledge Graphs of Research Concepts.” Article. IEEE ACCESS 10: 125867–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3220241.

Borycz, Joshua, Benjamin D. Horne, and R. Alexander Bentley. 2022. “FORKING PATHS OF CULTURAL COMPLEXITY: A CASE STUDY OF RESEARCH PARADIGMS.” Article. ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS 25 (05N06). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525922400045.

Bosco, Frank A. 2022. “Accumulating Knowledge in the Organizational Sciences.” Article. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 9: 441–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-090657.

Cena, Anna, Marek Gagolewski, Grzegorz Siudem, and Barbara Zogala-Siudem. 2022. “Validating Citation Models by Proxy Indices.” Article. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 16 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101267.

Cheng, Mengjie, Daniel Scott Smith, Xiang Ren, Hancheng Cao, Sanne Smith, and Daniel A. McFarland. 2023. “How New Ideas Diffuse in Science.” Article. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 88 (3): 522–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224231166955.

Cimini, Giulio, Andrea Zaccaria, and Andrea Gabrielli. 2016. “Investigating the Interplay Between Fundamentals of National Research Systems: Performance, Investments and International Collaborations.” Article. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 10 (1): 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.002.

Clauset, Aaron, Daniel B. Larremore, and Roberta Sinatra. 2017. “Data-Driven Predictions in the Science of Science.” Editorial Material. SCIENCE 355 (6324): 477–80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4217.

Contreras Kallens, P., Daniel J. Hicks, and C. D. Jennings. 2022. “Networks in Philosophy: Social Networks and Employment in Academic Philosophy.” Article. METAPHILOSOPHY 53 (5): 653–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12591.

Cuhls, Kerstin, Meike de Vries, Haili Li, and Ling Li. 2015. “Roadmapping: Comparing Cases in China and Germany.” Article. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE 101 (December): 238–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.008.

Dahlberg, Ingetraut. 2006. “Knowledge Organization: A New Science?” Article. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 33 (1): 11–19.

Danus, Lluis, Carles Muntaner, Alexander Krauss, Marta Sales-Pardo, and Roger Guimera. 2023. “Differences in Collaboration Structures and Impact Among Prominent Researchers in Europe and North America.” Article. EPJ DATA SCIENCE 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00378-6.

Dworkin, Jordan D., Russell T. Shinohara, and Danielle S. Bassett. 2018. “The Landscape of NeuroImage-Ing Research.” Article. NEUROIMAGE 183 (December): 872–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.005.

Elzinga, Aant. 2012. “The Rise and Demise of the International Council for Science Policy Studies (ICSPS) as a Cold War Bridging Organization.” Article. MINERVA 50 (3, SI): 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9205-7.

Fairclough, Ruth, and Mike Thelwall. 2022a. “Questionnaires Mentioned in Academic Research 1996–2019: Rapid Increase but Declining Citation Impact.” Article. Learned Publishing 35 (2): 241–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1417.

———. 2022b. “Questionnaires Mentioned in Academic Research 1996-2019: Rapid Increase but Declining Citation Impact.” Article. LEARNED PUBLISHING 35 (2): 241–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1417.

Fire, Michael, and Carlos Guestrin. 2019. “Over-Optimization of Academic Publishing Metrics: Observing Goodhart’s Law in Action.” Article. GIGASCIENCE 8 (6). https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz053.

Fischhoff, Baruch. 2013. “The Sciences of Science Communication.” Article. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 110 (3): 14033–39. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110.

Fleerackers, Alice. 2022. “A Focus on Science Communication at #ICA22.” Article; Proceedings Paper. JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 21 (6): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.21060601.

Fortunato, Santo, Carl T. Bergstrom, Katy Boerner, James A. Evans, Dirk Helbing, Stasa Milojevic, Alexander M. Petersen, et al. 2018. “Science of Science.” Review. SCIENCE 359 (6379). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185.

Fujita, Yoshiaki, and Michael S. Vitevitch. 2022. “Using Network Analyses to Examine the Extent to Which and in What Ways Psychology Is Multidisciplinary.” Article. HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01175-8.

Furman, Jeffrey L., Fiona Murray, and Scott Stern. 2012. “Growing Stem Cells: The Impact of Federal Funding Policy on the US Scientific Frontier.” Article. JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT 31 (3): 661–U151. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21644.

Garfield, Eugene. 2009. “From the Science of Science to Scientometrics Visualizing the History of Science with HistCite Software.” Article; Proceedings Paper. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 3 (3): 173–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.009.

Gerken, Mikkel. 2020. “Public Scientific Testimony in the Scientific Image.” Article. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 80 (April): 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.05.006.

Gołębiewska, Maria. 2020. “NORMATIVITY OF PRESCRIPTIONS IN ADOLF REINACH’s APRIORISTIC THEORY OF RIGHT.” Article. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 90: 41–61. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.90.04.

Guo, Hanning, Scott Weingart, and Katy Boerner. 2011. “Mixed-Indicators Model for Identifying Emerging Research Areas.” Article. SCIENTOMETRICS 89 (1): 421–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0433-7.

Hackett, Edward J., and Diana R. Rhoten. 2011. “Engaged, Embedded, Enjoined: Science and Technology Studies in the National Science Foundation.” Article. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 17 (4): 823–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9307-x.

Haghani, Milad, Soheil Sabri, Chris De Gruyter, Ali Ardeshiri, Zahra Shahhoseini, Thomas W. Sanchez, and Michele Acuto. 2023. “The Landscape and Evolution of Urban Planning Science.” Article. CITIES 136 (May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104261.

Hall, Michael J., Stephen K. Layson, and Albert N. Link. 2014. “The Returns to r&d: Division of Policy Research and Analysis at the National Science Foundation.” Article. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY 41 (4): 458–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct055.

HAMLIN, C. 1992. “REFLEXIVITY IN TECHNOLOGY STUDIES - TOWARD a TECHNOLOGY OF TECHNOLOGY (AND SCIENCE).” Article; Proceedings Paper. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 22 (3): 511–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312792022003004.

Hendriks, Friederike, Dorothe Kienhues, and Rainer Bromme. 2016. “Evoking Vigilance: Would You (Dis)trust a Scientist Who Discusses Ethical Implications of Research in a Science Blog?” Article. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE 25 (8, SI): 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516646048.

Howell, Abigail A., Michelle Jordan, Michael McKelvy, Bhanu Wahi-Singh, and Hannah Shadmany. 2023. “The Science of Science Is Fun: Assessing the Impact of Interactive Science Demonstrations Through Everyday Experiences and Near-Peer Role Modeling.” Article; Early Access. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2164473.

Huang, Junming, Alexander J. Gates, Roberta Sinatra, and Albert-Laszlo Barabasi. 2020. “Historical Comparison of Gender Inequality in Scientific Careers Across Countries and Disciplines.” Article. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 117 (9): 4609–16. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914221117.

Huang, Yurui, Chaolin Tian, and Yifang Ma. 2023. “Practical Operation and Theoretical Basis of Difference-in-Difference Regression in Science of Science: The Comparative Trial on the Scientific Performance of Nobel Laureates Versus Their Coauthors.” Article. JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCE 8 (1): 29–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0003.

Janosov, Milan, Federico Battiston, and Roberta Sinatra. 2020. “Success and Luck in Creative Careers.” Article. EPJ DATA SCIENCE 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00227-w.

Jaramillo, Ana Maria, Felipe Montes, and Ronaldo Menezes. 2023. “Nature Vs. Nurture in Science: The Effect of Researchers Segregation on Papers’ Citation Histories.” Proceedings Paper. In COMPLEX NETWORKS XIV, COMPLENET 2023, edited by AS Teixeira, F Botta, JF Mendes, R Menezes, and G Mangioni, 141–54. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND: SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28276-8\_13.

Jones, Molly Morgan, Catriona Manville, and Joanna Chataway. 2022. “Learning from the UK’s Research Impact Assessment Exercise: A Case Study of a Retrospective Impact Assessment Exercise and Questions for the Future.” Article. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 47 (3, SI): 722–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9608-6.

Kahan, Dan M. 2015. “Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem.” Article. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY 36 (1): 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12244.

Kim, Lanu, Daniel Scott Smith, Bas Hofstra, and Daniel A. McFarland. 2022. “Gendered Knowledge in Fields and Academic Careers.” Article. RESEARCH POLICY 51 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104411.

Kong, Xiangjie, Yajie Shi, Shuo Yu, Jiaying Liu, and Feng Xia. 2019. “Academic Social Networks: Modeling, Analysis, Mining and Applications.” Review. JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS 132: 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2019.01.029.

Koponen, Ismo T. 2021. “Nature of Science (NOS) Being Acquainted with Science of Science (SoS): Providing a Panoramic Picture of Sciences to Embody NOS for Pre-Service Teachers.” Article. EDUCATION SCIENCES 11 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030107.

Korzhuev, Andrey V., Yuliya B. Ikrennikova, Zakir A. Kuliev, Elena L. Ryazanova, and Elena N. Shadrina. 2022. “Pedagogy in the Constellation of Sciences: Methodological Dialogue and “Knowledge Transfer “.” Article. VOPROSY FILOSOFII, no. 6: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-6-75-86.

Kozlowski, Diego, Vincent Lariviere, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, and Thema Monroe-White. 2022. “Intersectional Inequalities in Science.” Article. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 119 (2). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113067119.

Kuznetsova, Nataliya, I. 2021. “The Embers of Memory.” Article. RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY 59 (6, SI): 473–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.2010473.

Lane, Julia I., Jason Owen-Smith, Rebecca F. Rosen, and Bruce A. Weinberg. 2015. “New Linked Data on Research Investments: Scientific Workforce, Productivity, and Public Value.” Article. RESEARCH POLICY 44 (9, SI): 1659–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.013.

Lane, Julia, and Dan Black. 2012. “Overview of the Science of Science Policy Symposium.” Editorial Material. JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT 31 (3): 598–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21632.

Largent, Mark A., and Julia I. Lane. 2012. “STAR METRICS and the Science of Science Policy.” Article. REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH 29 (3): 431–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00567.x.

LAUDAN, L. 1981. “THE PSEUDO-SCIENCE OF SCIENCE.” Article. PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES 11 (2): 173–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100205.

Letchford, Adrian, Helen Susannah Moat, and Tobias Preis. 2015. “The Advantage of Short Paper Titles.” Article. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2 (8). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150266.

Letchford, Adrian, Tobias Preis, and Helen Susannah Moat. 2016. “The Advantage of Simple Paper Abstracts.” Article. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 10 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.001.

Leydesdorff, Loet, and Caroline Wagner. 2009. “Macro-Level Indicators of the Relations Between Research Funding and Research Output.” Article. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 3 (4): 353–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.05.005.

Li, Jiabao, Di Wu, Houjiang Liu, Ying Ding, Jilie Zeng, and Alec McGail. 2022. “SHIFTING WINDS: GENDERED STRUCTURES OF ACADEMIC MENTORSHIP.” Proceedings Paper. In 2022 IEEE VIS ARTS PROGRAM (VISAP 2022), 14–29. 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA: IEEE; IEEE Comp Soc; IEEE VGTC; IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VISAP57411.2022.00010.

Li, Linzhuo, Lingfei Wu, and James Evans. 2020. “Social Centralization and Semantic Collapse: Hyperbolic Embeddings of Networks and Text.” Article. POETICS 78 (February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101428.

Li, Meiling, Yang Zhang, and Yang Wang. 2023. “Regression Discontinuity Design and Its Applications to Science of Science: A Survey.” Article; Early Access. JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCE. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0008.

Lin, Yi. 1988. “Can the World Be Studied in the Viewpoint of Systems ??” Article. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 11 (C): 738–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(88)90591-2.

Liu, Fengyuan, Talal Rahwan, and Bedoor AlShebli. 2023b. “Non-White Scientists Appear on Fewer Editorial Boards, Spend More Time Under Review, and Receive Fewer Citations.” Review. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 120 (13). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215324120.

———. 2023a. “Non-White Scientists Appear on Fewer Editorial Boards, Spend More Time Under Review, and Receive Fewer Citations.” Article. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120 (13). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215324120.

Liu, Jiaying, Xiangjie Kong, Feng Xia, Xiaomei Bai, Lei Wang, Qing Qing, and Ivan Lee. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence in the 21st Century.” Article. IEEE ACCESS 6: 34403–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2819688.

Liu, Juan, Shuang Xu, Wen-Can Tian, Xian-Wen Wang, and Xiao-Ke Xu. 2021. “Detection of Generalized “Chaperone Effect” Based on Author’s Signature Position; [基于论文作者署名位置的广义"陪护人效应"检测].” Article. Dianzi Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 50 (3): 428–36. https://doi.org/10.12178/1001-0548.2020350.

Liu, Lu, Benjamin F. Jones, Brian Uzzi, and Dashun Wang. 2023. “Data, Measurement and Empirical Methods in the Science of Science.” Review; Early Access. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01562-4.

Liu, Wenyuan, Stanislaw Saganowski, Przemyslaw Kazienko, and Siew Ann Cheong. 2019. “Predicting the Evolution of Physics Research from a Complex Network Perspective.” Article. ENTROPY 21 (12). https://doi.org/10.3390/e21121152.

Macedo, Mariana, Ana Maria Jaramillo, and Ronaldo Menezes. 2023. “Academic Mobility as a Driver of Productivity: A Gender-Centric Approach.” Proceedings Paper. In COMPLEX NETWORKS XIV, COMPLENET 2023, edited by AS Teixeira, F Botta, JF Mendes, R Menezes, and G Mangioni, 120–31. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND: SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28276-8\_11.

Mannocci, Andrea, Francesco Osborne, and Enrico Motta. 2019. “The Evolution of IJHCS and CHI: A Quantitative Analysis.” Article. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES 131 (SI): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.009.

McLevey, John, Alexander Graham V, Reid McIlroy-Young, Pierson Browne, and Kathryn S. Plaisance. 2018. “Interdisciplinarity and Insularity in the Diffusion of Knowledge: An Analysis of Disciplinary Boundaries Between Philosophy of Science and the Sciences.” Article. SCIENTOMETRICS 117 (1): 331–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2866-8.

Milojevic, Stasa. 2015. “Quantifying the Cognitive Extent of Science.” Article. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 9 (4): 962–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.10.005.

Miura, Takahiro, Kimitaka Asatani, and Ichiro Sakata. 2023. “Revisiting the Uniformity and Inconsistency of Slow-Cited Papers in Science.” Article. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101378.

Molontay, Roland, and Marcell Nagy. 2019. “Two Decades of Network Science as Seen Through the Co-Authorship Network of Network Scientists.” Proceedings Paper. In PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM 2019), edited by F Spezzano, W Chen, and X Xiao, 578–83. 1601 Broadway, 10th Floor, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES: IEEE; Assoc Comp Machinery; IEEE Comp Soc; ACM SIGKDD; IEEE TCDE; Springer; Elsevier; ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341161.3343685.

Nisbet, Matthew C., and Declan Fahy. 2015. “The Need for Knowledge-Based Journalism in Politicized Science Debates.” Editorial Material. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE 658 (1): 223–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214559887.

Notten, Ad, Jacques Mairesse, and Bart Verspagen. 2017. “The CDM Framework: Knowledge Recombination from an Evolutionary Viewpoint.” Article. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 26 (1-2): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1202520.

Palchykov, Vasyl, Valerio Gemmetto, Alexey Boyarsky, and Diego Garlaschelli. 2016b. “Ground Truth? Concept-Based Communities Versus the External Classification of Physics Manuscripts.” Article. EPJ DATA SCIENCE 5. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0090-4.

———. 2016a. “Ground Truth? Concept-Based Communities Versus the External Classification of Physics Manuscripts.” Article. EPJ Data Science 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0090-4.

Patelli, Aurelio, Lorenzo Napolitano, Giulio Cimini, and Andrea Gabrielli. 2023. “Geography of Science: Competitiveness and Inequality.” Article. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101357.

Petersen, Alexander Michael, Santo Fortunato, Raj K. Pan, Kimmo Kaski, Orion Penner, Armando Rungi, Massimo Riccaboni, H. Eugene Stanley, and Fabio Pammolli. 2014. “Reputation and Impact in Academic Careers.” Article. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 111 (43): 15316–21. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323111111.

Petersen, Alexander M., Ioannis Pavlidis, and Ioanna Semendeferi. 2014. “A Quantitative Perspective on Ethics in Large Team Science.” Article. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 20 (4): 923–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9562-8.

Petersen, Alexander M., and Orion Penner. 2014. “Inequality and Cumulative Advantage in Science Careers: A Case Study of High-Impact Journals.” Article. EPJ DATA SCIENCE 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0024-y.

Petersen, Alexander M., Massimo Riccaboni, H. Eugene Stanley, and Fabio Pammolli. 2012. “Persistence and Uncertainty in the Academic Career.” Article. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 109 (14): 5213–18. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121429109.

Poggi, Francesco, Paolo Ciancarini, Aldo Gangemi, Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese, Silvio Peroni, and Valentina Presutti. 2019b. “Predicting the Results of Evaluation Procedures of Academics.” Article. PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.199.

———. 2019a. “Predicting the Results of Evaluation Procedures of Academics.” Article. PeerJ 5. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.199.

Reisz, Niklas, Vito D. P. Servedio, Vittorio Loreto, William Schueller, Márcia R. Ferreira, and Stefan Thurner. 2022. “Loss of Sustainability in Scientific Work.” Article. New Journal of Physics 24 (5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac6ca1.

Robin, Libby. 2022. “Soil in the Air.” Article. HISTORICAL RECORDS OF AUSTRALIAN SCIENCE 33 (2): 110–21. https://doi.org/10.1071/HR21014.

Rose, Michael E., and John R. Kitchin. 2019. “Pybliometrics: Scriptable Bibliometrics Using a Python Interface to Scopus.” Article. SOFTWAREX 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2019.100263.

Rzhetsky, Andrey, Jacob G. Foster, Ian T. Foster, and James A. Evans. 2015. “Choosing Experiments to Accelerate Collective Discovery.” Article. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 112 (47): 14569–74. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509757112.

Saks, MJ, DM Risinger, R Rosenthal, and WC Thompson. 2003. “Context Effects in Forensic Science: A Review and Application of the Science of Science to Crime Laboratory Practice in the United States.” Review. SCIENCE & JUSTICE 43 (2): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(03)71747-X.

Salatino, Angelo A., Francesco Osborne, Thiviyan Thanapalasingam, and Enrico Motta. 2019. “The CSO Classifier: Ontology-Driven Detection of Research Topics in Scholarly Articles.” Proceedings Paper. In DIGITAL LIBRARIES FOR OPEN KNOWLEDGE, TPDL 2019, edited by A Doucet, A Isaac, K Golub, T Aalberg, and A Jatowt, 11799:296–311. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND: SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30760-8\_26.

Scheufele, Dietram A. 2022. “Thirty Years of Science-Society Interfaces: What’s Next?” Article. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE 31 (3, SI): 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221075947.

Schulz, Christian, Amin Mazloumian, Alexander M. Petersen, Orion Penner, and Dirk Helbing. 2014. “Exploiting Citation Networks for Large-Scale Author Name Disambiguation.” Article. EPJ DATA SCIENCE 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0011-3.

Seckin, Ozgur Can, and Onur Varol. 2022. “Academic Support Network Reflects Doctoral Experience and Productivity.” Article. EPJ DATA SCIENCE 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00369-z.

Servedio, Vito D. P., Marcia R. Ferreira, Niklas Reisz, Rodrigo Costas, and Stefan Thurner. 2023. “Scale-Free Growth in Regional Scientific Capacity Building Explains Long-Term Scientific Dominance.” Article. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS 167 (February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.113020.

Shaikh, Abdul Rahman, Hamed Alhoori, and Maoyuan Sun. 2023a. “YouTube and Science: Models for Research Impact.” Article. Scientometrics 128 (2): 933–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04574-5.

———. 2023b. “YouTube and Science: Models for Research Impact.” Article. SCIENTOMETRICS 128 (2): 933–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04574-5.

Shao, Zhou, Sha Yuan, and Yongli Wang. 2020. “Institutional Collaboration and Competition in Artificial Intelligence.” Article. IEEE ACCESS 8: 69734–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986383.

Shao, Zhou, Ruoyan Zhao, Sha Yuan, Ming Ding, and Yongli Wang. 2022. “Tracing the Evolution of AI in the Past Decade and Forecasting the Emerging Trends.” Review. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118221.

Shchennikova, L. V. 2016. “THE SCIENCE OF CIVIL LAW AS THE SUBJECT OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.” Proceedings Paper. In METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF THE CIVIL RESEARCHES, edited by AV Gabov, VG Golubtsov, and OA Kuznetsova, 305–12. L LOBACHEVSKOGO, 92, MOSCOW, 119454, RUSSIA: STATUT PUBL HOUSE.

Shekhar, and Marco Valeri. 2023. “Trends in Knowledge Management Research in Small Businesses.” Review; Early Access. EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2022-0200.

Shmonin, Dmitry, V. 2022. “Theology and Philosophy of Science: Problems of Identification.” Article. VOPROSY FILOSOFII, no. 1: 197–207. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-1-197-207.

Silva, Austin R., Glory E. Avina, and Jeffrey Y. Tsao. 2016. “The Art of Research: Opportunities for a Science-Based Approach.” Proceedings Paper. In FOUNDATIONS OF AUGMENTED COGNITION: NEUROERGONOMICS AND OPERATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, PT II, edited by DD Schmorrow and CM Fidopiastis, 9744:431–41. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39952-2\_42.

Smalheiser, Neil R., Jodi Schneider, Vetle Torvik I, Dean P. Fragnito, and Eric E. Tirk. 2022. “The Citation Cloud of a Biomedical Article: A Free, Public, Web-Based Tool Enabling Citation Analysis.” Article. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 110 (1): 103–8. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1117.

Smith, Thomas Bryan, Raffaele Vacca, Till Krenz, and Christopher McCarty. 2021. “Great Minds Think Alike, or Do They Often Differ? Research Topic Overlap and the Formation of Scientific Teams.” Article. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101104.

Stevens, S. S. 1939. “Psychology and the Science of Science.” Article. Psychological Bulletin 36 (4): 221–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056886.

Stoknes, Per Espen. 2014. “Rethinking Climate Communications and the “Psychological Climate Paradox”.” Article. Energy Research and Social Science 1: 161–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.007.

Suleimenov, Ibragim, Oleg Gabrielyan, and Yelizaveta Vitulyova. 2022. “DIALECTICS OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF INNOVATIONS THEORY.” Article. WISDOM 24 (4): 25–35. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v24i4.913.

Sun, Xiaoling, Jasleen Kaur, Stasa Milojevic, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2013. “Social Dynamics of Science.” Article. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01069.

THAGARD, P. 1992. “BEREITER ON KNOWLEDGE.” Article. INTERCHANGE 23 (4): 363–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01447281.

Thelwall, Mike. 2020. “Author Gender Differences in Psychology Citation Impact 1996-2018.” Article. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 55 (4): 684–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12633.

Thomas, Diana W., and Michael D. Thomas. 2020. “Behavioral Symmetry, Rent Seeking, and the Republic of Science.” Article. PUBLIC CHOICE 183 (3-4, SI): 443–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00807-4.

Tokmachev, Andrey M. 2023. “Regular Collective Dynamics of Research Collaboration.” Article. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS 610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.128437.

Visvanathan, S. 2002. “The Future of Science Studies.” Article. FUTURES 34 (1): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00037-4.

Viswalekshmi, B. R., Deepthi Bendi, and Alex Opoku. 2023. “Exploring the Trends in Construction Waste Reduction Research: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Article. Science and Technology Libraries 42 (2): 155–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2022.2047871.

Viswanath, K., Rachel Faulkenberry McCloud, Edmund W. J. Lee, and Mesfin A. Bekalu. 2022. “Measuring What Matters: Data Absenteeism, Science Communication, and the Perpetuation of Inequities.” Article. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE 700 (1, SI): 208–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221093268.

Wagner, Claudia, Tatiana Sennikova, Olga Zagovora, and Fariba Karimi. 2018. “Collective Attention Towards Scientists and Research Topics.” Conference paper. WebSci 2018 - Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3201064.3201097.

Wang, Kuansan, Zhihong Shen, Chiyuan Huang, Chieh-Han Wu, Darrin Eide, Yuxiao Dong, Junjie Qian, Anshul Kanakia, Alvin Chen, and Richard Rogahn. 2019. “A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies.” Review. FRONTIERS IN BIG DATA 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00045.

Wang, Ming-Huang, Yuh-Shan Ho, and Hui-Zhen Fu. 2019. “Global Performance and Development on Sustainable City Based on Natural Science and Social Science Research: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Article. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 666: 1245–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.139.

Way, Samuel F., Allison C. Morgan, Daniel B. Larremore, and Aaron Clauset. 2019. “Productivity, Prominence, and the Effects of Academic Environment.” Article. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 166 (22): 10729–33. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817431116.

Weinberg, Bella Hass. 1974. “Bibliographic Coupling: A Review.” Article. Information Storage and Retrieval 10 (5-6): 189–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(74)90058-8.

Weinberg, Bruce A. 2011. “Developing Science: Scientific Performance and Brain Drains in the Developing World.” Article; Proceedings Paper. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS 95 (1, SI): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.05.009.

Youyou, Wu, Yang Yang, and Brian Uzzi. 2023. “A Discipline-Wide Investigation of the Replicability of Psychology Papers over the Past Two Decades.” Article. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 120 (6). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208863120.

Yuan, Sha, Zhou Shao, Xingxing Wei, Jie Tang, Wendy Hall, Yongli Wang, Ying Wang, and Ye Wang. 2020. “Science Behind AI: The Evolution of Trend, Mobility, and Collaboration.” Article. SCIENTOMETRICS 124 (2): 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03423-7.

Zeng, An, Zhesi Shen, Jianlin Zhou, Jinshan Wu, Ying Fan, Yougui Wang, and H. Eugene Stanley. 2017. “The Science of Science: From the Perspective of Complex Systems.” Review. PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS 714: 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.001.

Zhang, Meishu, Yu Jia, Nianxin Wang, and Shilun Ge. 2019. “Using Relative Tie Strength to Identify Core Teams of Scientific Research.” Article. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING 14 (23): 33–54. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i23.10394.

Zhao, Qianqian, Weixiang Zhang, Runmiao Wang, Yitao Wang, and Defang Ouyang. 2017. “Research Advances in Molecular Modeling in Cyclodextrins.” Review. CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN 23 (3): 522–31. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612822666161208142617.

Zhao, Xinyi, Aliakbar Akbaritabar, Ridhi Kashyap, and Emilio Zagheni. 2023. “A Gender Perspective on the Global Migration of Scholars.” Article. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120 (10). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2214664120.

Posted on:
June 26, 2023
Length:
37 minute read, 7759 words
See Also: